The #dieselgate Crusade (Part 2)

Following on from an earlier blog post

The US-EPA, politicians, presstitutes and activists pretending to be journalists regularly conflate different types of tailpipe emissions. They wouldn’t do it if they were trying to inform the public. Instead they only try to persuade it.

Steve Milloy addressed the fanatic tailpipe sniffers in this article on Breitbart. emissions-test-getty-640x480

MIT researchers are claiming that Volkswagen’s diesel emissions shenanigans have killed 60 unidentified Americans. They further claim that unless VW fixes the emissions problem by the end of 2016, another 130 unidentified people will bite the dust. This is all nonsense.

Milloy continues:

The study is based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] claims that airborne particulate matter (e.g., soot from smokestacks and tailpipes) and ground-level ozone (i.e., smog) kill people. The EPA’s claims are entirely fraudulent. EPA knows it. Congress knows it. Industry knows it. I know it because I’ve taken the time to investigate and even to litigate them.

EPA’s epidemiology studies are highly controversial. All rely on exceedingly weak statistical correlations between dubious air monitoring data and death rates. …
EPA’s animal toxicology studies are unhelpful to EPA, since no animal has ever died during them despite animals being exposed to PM at levels hundreds of times greater than humans would ever inhale. …
EPA has conducted human clinical studies of PM for the express purpose of attempting to validate its epidemiology. … EPA has exposed these people to levels of PM up to 21 times greater than the maximum EPA allows in outdoor air and 75 times greater than measured in typical outdoor air. But no human test subject has ever died or even experienced a health effect traceable to PM.

In the real world, underground miners and diesel equipment operators can be exposed to PM at levels a thousand times higher than in outdoor air on a career basis. … they actually have a greater life expectancy than the average person breathing blue-sky clean air.

In Washington, D.C., life expectancy is about 76.5 years. But in Beijing, where PM levels are on average 10 times higher, life expectancy is three years greater.

There are no ozone-related deaths either. The epidemiology is inadequate. No animals, including the human guinea pigs, have died. There is not a recorded case of ambient ozone killing anyone under any circumstances.

As the claimed deaths from VW diesel emissions are entirely based on EPA’s bogus PM and ozone claims, the VW-related death claims are bogus as well. … they are all statistical deaths — i.e., deaths that only occur in the minds and studies of dishonest researchers.

The UK’s Which? (consumer) magazine has an article titled Car emissions: is nobody clean?.

In light of the recent emissions scandal, we extracted and analysed detailed emissions data for over 300 cars that we’ve tested since 2012, in order to find out what cars are really emitting into our atmosphere.

Despite all of the vehicles officially complying with recent EU emission regulations (either Euro 5 or the tougher Euro 6 depending on the age of car) our realistic testing found there is a chasm like gap between what is claimed and what is pumped into our air:

• Staggeringly, nearly all (95%) the diesel cars emitted more oxides of nitrogen (NOx) during our tests than official limits allow. …;
• One in 10 (10%) petrol cars also emitted more NOx than limits allow;
• Two-thirds (65%) of petrol cars emit more Carbon Monoxide than the 2006 limit (Euro 4)…;
• Despite being a hybrid, the Peugeot 508 RXH also creates more NOx than EU limits. Several petrol hybrids (the worst being the Lexus LS) also create more CO than limits would allow;
38 of the cars we tested were even unable to meet the ‘Euro 1’ emissions standards from 1993.

Keep in mind that their test cycle is not directly comparable to the emissions test cycle so there’s no automatic disqualification for failing to comply with the relevant standards. I’ve highlighted a significant observation: that compliance with new standards doesn’t guarantee compliance with old ones; where greater emissions were allowed under a different test cycle.


We’ve found that of the cars we’ve tested, all of which are officially compliant with either Euro 5 or Euro 6, 85 exceed Euro 3 limits in our tests. This means these 85 cars do not pass the earliest emission regulations from this century.

Yes: Some don’t comply with the previous standards, emitting more actually toxic substances than was previously allowed. Those offenders include some hybrid vehicles. Sit back and think about that.

It is entirely possible that the practical emissions of vehicles haven’t been reduced substantially at all since the mid 1990′s; when Euro 3 was being drafted. The objective has been CO2-reduction. e.g. from the EU legislation for Euro 3:

Statement by the European Parliament and the Council
Re Article 5a (new)
The European Parliament and the Council take note of the ongoing discussions between the Commission and the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) regarding a voluntary undertaking by the industry to reduce the average CO2 emissions from passenger vehicles. … with the aim of reducing average passenger car fuel consumption to 120 g of CO2/km.

And that isn’t working out either; heavier vehicles necessitated by technologies to comply with new regulations; and lots of optional extras (not included in test cycle vehicles) offered effectively as standard; as only the “pov-pack” level of cars with minimal equipment, skinny tyres, etc. are tested for compliance.

P.S. My 25-year old personal car met Euro 2 requirements when it was made.

Other previous blog posts:


… and much, much more.

This entry was posted in Carbon Tax, Environment, Mobility, Science, Travel, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The #dieselgate Crusade (Part 2)

  1. Pingback: How to Boil a Frog | contrary2belief

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s